Quick Login:
 

COVER: Kajal aggarwal on FHM

Comments  Comments [ 15 ]    By Nadia M. | 06 September 2011 | 12:21pm


Bollycurry unveils for you the FHM cover page for September. And the unveiling happens in literal sense too, as Singham's Kajal Aggarwal drops the 'top' to daringly bare to feature on the cover of this edition.

The clothing compliment to her rather enticing get up is only a pair of polka dot stockings; and the tagline hinting about the cover story reads ...not everything nice comes in a bottle!

From men and booze, to the 100 things guaranteed to change your life, or even fact-files about best friends stealing girlfriends - this issue covers a wide range of entertainers.

Joining the ranks of few tinsel town starlets before herself, Kajol gambles with a bold cover page flash at this nascent stage of her career. What's your verdict?

Author: Harjot D.
Editor(s): Naseem & Gunia.
Graphics: Pooji.

Copyright  BollyCurry

User Rating  Rating(5 Votes)

Views  4303

Bookmark and Share

Go to top

User Comments

Join Bollycurry

If You are a member of India-forums, Then You can also log in here.

Quick Login

  • UnIqUe954
    Date: 9/6/2011 4:46:05 PMUnIqUe954

    These pplz r just copying hollywood, like comeon theres something called cultural values, i mean if u want to copy hollywod so badly then just change the name ''bollywood' take out the b n put on an h infornt <br/>i mean going 'bare' is just not india---<br/>india is known for its culture values and tradition ---thats what makes it different and special---but if u guys want to lose the ethnicity so then go head
    2011-09-06 21:01:51

  • upensr
    Date: 9/6/2011 3:41:06 PMupensr

    she is saying it's morphed...
    but this doesn't look like so...
    If it is morphed then please let me know who is the talented guy.2011-09-06 15:41:51

  • choudhary.a
    Date: 9/6/2011 3:27:17 PMchoudhary.a

    i don't see fashion in this pic

  • taral83
    Date: 9/6/2011 2:22:35 PMtaral83

    i really don't get it...what is so "fashionista"about topless??? There is no fashion involved, as she has no cloths on to begin with... We all already know that the biggest fashion designer, "God", has created the greatest master pieces in the universe, the human body. But he didn't intended to be show cased in such a vulgar way. It was meant to be appreciated, respected and COVERED!!!!! Adam and Eve even had little cover-ups made with leaves, for god sake!!! And again my humble respect to India-forum, such magazine covers should be banned on this forum as we have many young members. They don't need to get this from us. I am sure they get it from other places. But why can't we keep "our" forum clean and safe? Disgusting. And I liked her to, but I guess as someone said she gave me another reason why I love Madhuri, Kajol, Juhi etc. These new girls on the block seem to think that its become a qualification to be able to kiss on screen, flaunt all you have and wear as minimum as possible in order to be a big actress. Well I hope they take a look at Bollywood's history and learn that its "TALENT" you need, not insensibility!!!2011-09-06 14:22:50

  • hero0092
    Date: 9/6/2011 12:09:48 PMhero0092

    i didnt expect this
    from her

  • SmokingDreams
    Date: 9/6/2011 11:45:48 AMSmokingDreams

    I think its morphed..These things disgust me..Why cant glamour and hotness come with clothing..UGH..One extra reason why I love Madhuri Dixit and Kajol..

  • LOVE_DMG
    Date: 9/6/2011 10:35:00 AMLOVE_DMG

    so what the mag. cover suppose to mean? the nest fashion thing is go around topless with pok-a-dot leggings?
    man are fashion desiners running out of ideas these days?

  • --PiaSenGupta--
    Date: 9/6/2011 10:03:24 AM--PiaSenGupta--

    Hey all i heard she claimed this photo is morphed

  • -DulceMaria-
    Date: 9/6/2011 8:58:18 AM-DulceMaria-

    She is looking great and everything is covered if not by clothes atleast by her arms, its not vulgar at all and she looks stunning :)

  • lakshmivijaya
    Date: 9/6/2011 8:04:59 AMlakshmivijaya

    such ppl make the feminine gender to suffer
    if a man undresses a woman its a crime if the woman does to herself posing to cam then what it is called , woman rights???????? woman is meant for entertaiment only
    a woman can be shown attractive , romantic & even utter sexiness even with out shedding the clothes to this extent , even its a art so we shld not cry when women r harassed after such